News

/ Taxes and Law in Poland

Tax deregulation in Poland: what Deregulation 2.0 may change for businesses

Tax deregulation in Poland: what Deregulation 2.0 may change for businesses

/
Date14 Jul 2026
/
Stay up to date Add us as a preferred source on Google
Add

Tax deregulation in Poland under the announced Deregulation 2.0 package may simplify selected tax procedures, but it does not remove the taxpayer’s responsibility for correct settlements.

The key proposals include pre-filled VAT returns, e-receipts issued through a free mobile application, a 5-year validity period for individual tax rulings, broader use of silent consent, clearer timelines for verification activities, a longer appeal deadline and changes to local property tax procedures.

For foreign-owned companies operating in Poland, the practical value of Deregulation 2.0 will depend on data quality, internal tax controls and the final wording of the legislation. Businesses should not redesign tax processes solely on the basis of announcements, but they should already review VAT reporting, correction procedures, tax ruling registers, document flows and communication with Polish tax authorities.


What is Deregulation 2.0 in Polish tax law?

Tax deregulation in Poland refers to a package of government proposals presented on 6 July 2026. The aim is to simplify selected tax settlements, reduce administrative friction and improve the relationship between taxpayers and the Polish tax administration.

At this stage, Deregulation 2.0 should be treated as an announced direction of reform, not as a complete set of binding tax rules. Its business impact will depend on the final legislation, implementation dates and detailed administrative practice.

For companies, the most important point is practical: fewer formalities will not automatically mean lower tax risk. Polish taxpayers will still need to verify source data, document transactions and prove that tax returns are correct.

Tax Deregulation in Poland

Deregulation 2.0 — key proposals for businesses in Poland

Current Status

Announced proposals — not yet binding law

Digital VAT

Pre-filled VAT returns — taxpayer verification will remain required

E-receipts

Mobile application and e-receipts — potential alternative to physical cash registers

Silent consent

Positive outcome after no response — in selected procedural matters

Tax procedures

Clearer verification timelines and fewer duplicate document requests

Appeals

14 → 30 DAYS

Appeal deadline; more consistent property tax interpretations

Tax rulings

5 YEARS

Validity period — subject to the final legislation


Is tax deregulation in Poland already in force?

No. Deregulation 2.0 is currently a package of proposals and announced changes. It is not yet a full set of binding Polish tax regulations.

This distinction matters for businesses. Companies should not change their VAT, Corporate Income Tax (CIT), payroll or document management procedures based only on public announcements.

A more practical approach is to identify the areas that may be affected and prepare them for later implementation.

Foreign companies operating in Poland should pay particular attention to internal communication with headquarters. The Polish tax system is formalised and document-heavy, so even simplification measures usually require careful local implementation.


What may change in VAT compliance in Poland?

One of the most important proposals is the introduction of pre-filled VAT returns. The Polish tax administration would prepare a draft VAT return based on data already available in official systems. The taxpayer would then verify the data and approve the submission.

For businesses, this could reduce manual work. It would not, however, replace substantive VAT review.

The tax authority may prepare the draft data, but the company would still need to confirm whether sales, purchases, corrections and cross-border transactions have been classified correctly.

VAT areaWhat the company would still need to check
SalesVAT rates, tax point and correct recognition of taxable supplies
PurchasesRight to deduct input VAT
CorrectionsCorrect reporting period for invoice and return adjustments
Cross-border transactionsImport of services, intra-Community supplies, intra-Community acquisitions and exports
Source dataConsistency between invoices, receipts, accounting systems and VAT records

In practice, pre-filled VAT returns can only accelerate compliance if the company’s source data is complete and consistent. If invoice flows or sales data contain errors, automation may simply expose them faster.

This is why reliable accounting services in Poland will remain important, especially for foreign-owned companies with complex reporting lines, shared service centres or group-level ERP systems.


How could mobile cash registers and e-receipts work in Poland?

Deregulation 2.0 also proposes the use of a free online application instead of a physical fiscal cash register. A taxpayer would issue receipts through a mobile device, while the customer could receive a QR code receipt or an e-receipt.

Traditional fiscal cash registers and online virtual cash registers are expected to remain available for businesses that prefer the existing model.

For smaller companies, this may reduce the cost of handling retail sales. For larger organisations, the key issue will be system integration rather than the application itself.

Type of businessPotential benefitWhat should be checked
Small service businessLower cost of recording salesReceipt archiving and sales evidence
Mobile sales teamEasier receipt issuing outside the officeBackup procedures and device access
Retail chainPossible process automationIntegration with POS and ERP systems
Foreign-owned companyEasier handling of local Polish requirementsAlignment with group reporting standards

E-receipts should not be treated as a purely technical change. They affect the tax data flow between sales, accounting, reporting and audit evidence.

Newsletter getsix® Information Service
Stay a step ahead of the changes
Tax, labour law, HR and payroll in Poland — the key updates delivered to your inbox before they take effect.
Tax, labour law, HR and payroll in Poland — key updates delivered to your inbox.
Subscribe  →

Will individual tax rulings in Poland be valid for 5 years?

One of the most important proposals concerns individual tax rulings. Under the announced rules, they would have a 5-year validity period, while the tax administration would be responsible for monitoring their continued relevance.

If the law has not changed, the validity of a ruling could be extended. If the authority changes its position during the validity period, the taxpayer should not have to pay tax arrears for the period in which it followed the earlier interpretation.

This would be highly relevant for tax risk management in Poland. For many companies, the problem is not only obtaining a tax ruling, but also knowing whether it still reflects current legislation and the company’s actual business model.

Businesses should already prepare a register of existing tax rulings.

What should a tax ruling register include?Why it matters
Date of issueHelps control the ruling’s period of relevance
Tax areaVAT, CIT, WHT, PIT, property tax or another tax
Description of factsA ruling protects only the specific situation described
Related business processLinks the ruling to real operational activity
Last review dateShows whether the ruling is still useful and accurate

Companies using tax advisory in Poland should prioritise rulings related to recurring transactions, intra-group settlements, withholding tax, VAT classification and cross-border flows.


Silent consent means that in selected matters, the absence of a response from the tax authority within the statutory deadline would be treated as a positive decision for the taxpayer.

Under Deregulation 2.0, this principle may be expanded to selected procedural matters. These may include extensions of tax deadlines, remission of procedural costs, restoration of certain deadlines and selected requests related to suspended proceedings or appeal withdrawals.

For businesses, this could reduce waiting time and improve predictability. At the same time, silent consent only works if deadlines and procedural evidence are controlled properly.

A company should always keep:

  • confirmation that the application was filed,
  • proof of delivery,
  • information on the authority’s response deadline,
  • a named person responsible for monitoring the case,
  • documentation showing the exact scope of the request.

Lack of response from the authority can only help the taxpayer if the company can prove that all procedural requirements were met.


How may verification activities become clearer for Polish taxpayers?

Deregulation 2.0 proposes clearer rules for verification activities conducted by the Polish tax authorities. The taxpayer should receive clear information on when such activities start and when they should end.

This matters because verification activities are often less formal than a tax audit, but they can still have serious business consequences. The authority may request explanations, documents, corrections or additional data.

Another important proposal is that the tax office should not request documents that it can already access through official IT systems. This could reduce duplication and unnecessary administrative work.

The announced taxpayer protection is particularly important. A taxpayer who follows the findings made during verification activities should be protected against late-payment interest and fiscal penal proceedings in that specific scope.

For companies, this means that communication with the tax authority should be documented more carefully. Every response, request, finding and correction should be archived in a way that allows the full case history to be reconstructed.


What does the 50% interest proposal mean for tax corrections?

Another proposal concerns errors in tax returns. The system would identify and flag an error, and a taxpayer who corrects it before the authority intervenes would pay only 50% of the interest and avoid fiscal penal consequences.

The reduced interest rate would also apply to taxpayers who file an initial return late, provided they do so voluntarily and pay the tax before receiving a request from the authority.

This rewards active error detection and quick correction. For businesses, it means that internal review procedures will matter more, not less.

Tax areaWhat should be prepared
VATProcedure for correcting Standard Audit File for Tax for VAT (JPK_VAT) and invoices
CITReview of tax-deductible costs and revenue recognition
PIT / payrollVerification of tax advances and employee benefits
WHTReview of certificates of residence and due diligence files
Property taxReview of area, classification and local tax rates

The simplification will be most valuable for companies that can detect errors early, correct them quickly and document the reason for the correction.


Will companies have more time to appeal tax decisions in Poland?

Yes, according to the announcement, the deadline for appealing a tax decision would be extended from 14 to 30 days.

This is important for businesses, especially in cases involving large document sets, board-level approvals or external tax advice.

In practice, 14 days is often too short to prepare a complete argument, especially in disputes involving VAT, CIT, withholding tax, transfer pricing or cross-border transactions.

For foreign-owned companies, the longer deadline may be even more valuable. A Polish tax decision often needs to be translated, explained to headquarters and approved internally before an appeal strategy can be finalised.


What may change in property tax in Poland?

Deregulation 2.0 also covers selected local tax issues. One proposal concerns co-owned real estate. Property tax would be calculated proportionally to ownership share, instead of being enforced in full from one co-owner.

Another key direction is the unification of tax interpretations in local taxes. At present, property tax interpretations are issued by municipalities, which can lead to different practice across Poland.

After the change, uniform interpretations would apply nationwide and would be issued by one authority. For companies holding real estate in multiple locations, this could improve predictability.

This will be particularly relevant for manufacturing, logistics, retail and real estate businesses.

Business profileWhy the change may matter
Manufacturing companyProperty classification can materially affect local tax cost
Logistics operatorMultiple warehouses may be located in different municipalities
Retail chainConsistent treatment across locations supports budgeting
Real estate companyUnified interpretation practice may reduce local uncertainty

What does Deregulation 2.0 mean for foreign-owned companies in Poland?

For foreign companies doing business in Poland, Deregulation 2.0 may make contact with the tax administration easier and selected procedures more predictable. It does not mean that Polish tax obligations will become automatic or less important.

Foreign-owned companies should focus on five areas:

  • VAT – Pre-filled returns may reduce administrative work, but transactions, VAT rates, input VAT deduction and source data still need review
  • Tax rulings – Greater certainty is useful only if the facts described in the ruling still match the company’s Polish operations
  • Verification activities – Clearer deadlines may improve procedural safety, but communication with the authority must be documented
  • Property tax – A unified national approach may help companies with assets in several locations
  • Appeals – A 30-day deadline may support translation, group consultation and corporate approvals

For groups operating through Polish subsidiaries, the main task will be to translate regulatory simplification into internal procedures that headquarters can understand and approve.


How should companies prepare for tax deregulation in Poland?

The best preparation is to review the processes that may be affected by the announced changes.

In practice, companies should:

  1. prepare or update a register of tax rulings,
  2. review VAT, CIT and PIT correction procedures,
  3. organise sales and purchase document workflows,
  4. analyse the history of verification activities,
  5. review property tax settlements,
  6. assign responsibility for monitoring procedural deadlines,
  7. check whether sales systems can support e-receipts,
  8. prepare a short management-level explanation for headquarters or the board.

Companies with clean data, clear responsibilities and documented procedures will benefit most from deregulation. Administrative simplification will not help if tax documentation is incomplete or ownership of tax processes is unclear.

Simplification vs. Responsibility

Where simplification ends and business responsibility begins

Tax Administration

What the tax administration may simplify

Prepare draft VAT return data

Enable mobile receipts and e-receipts

Introduce clearer procedural deadlines

Extend the appeal period

Reduce repeated document requests

Provide more consistent tax interpretations

The Company

What the company must still control

VAT rates and tax points

Input VAT deduction eligibility

Corrections and reporting periods

Cross-border transaction classification

Completeness of invoices and accounting data

Evidence, deadlines and communication with authorities

Automation changes the process — not the accountability

Business Readiness

Data quality Tax controls Documentation Process ownership Deadline monitoring

FAQ: tax deregulation in Poland

Is Deregulation 2.0 already binding law in Poland?

No. Deregulation 2.0 is currently a package of announced proposals. Companies should monitor the legislative process and update procedures after detailed provisions are published.

What is the most important VAT change for businesses in Poland?

The most important announced VAT change is the introduction of pre-filled VAT returns supported by e-receipts. Taxpayers would still need to verify the data before submission.

Will individual tax rulings in Poland be valid for 5 years?

That is the announced direction. Individual tax rulings would have a 5-year validity period, with the administration monitoring their continued relevance. Details will depend on the final legislation.

What is silent consent in Polish tax procedures?

Silent consent means that in selected cases, no response from the authority within the deadline would be treated as a positive decision for the taxpayer.

Will the deadline for appealing a Polish tax decision be extended?

According to the announcement, yes. The appeal deadline would be extended from 14 to 30 days, which may help in complex tax disputes and foreign-owned group structures.

What should companies do now?

Companies should review tax processes, tax ruling registers, correction procedures, VAT documentation, communication with tax authorities and property tax settlements.

Summary

Tax deregulation in Poland under Deregulation 2.0 may become an important step towards simpler and more predictable relations between taxpayers and the Polish tax administration.

The key proposals concern digital tax settlements, individual tax rulings, silent consent, verification activities, appeals and local taxes.

For businesses, the decisive issue will be how the proposals are translated into binding legislation. Simplification may reduce part of the administrative burden, but it will not replace responsibility for accurate tax data, complete documentation and well-controlled internal processes.

getsix® supports companies with tax advisory in Poland, accounting services in Poland, VAT compliance and ongoing tax settlements for businesses operating in Poland. If the announced changes may affect your tax processes, it is worth reviewing them before the new rules enter into force. Contact us.

If you have any questions regarding this topic or if you are in need for any additional information – please do not hesitate to contact us:

Ask a question »

CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS DEPARTMENT

ELŻBIETA<br/>NARON - GROCHALSKA

ELŻBIETA
NARON-GROCHALSKA

Head of Customer Relationships
Department / Senior Manager
getsix® Group
pl en de

***

This publication is non-binding information and serves for general information purposes. The information provided does not constitute legal, tax or management advice and does not replace individual advice. Despite careful processing, all information in this publication is provided without any guarantee for the accuracy, up-to-date nature or completeness of the information. The information in this publication is not suitable as the sole basis for action and cannot replace actual advice in individual cases. The liability of the authors or getsix® are excluded. We kindly ask you to contact us directly for a binding consultation if required. The content of this publication iis the intellectual property of getsix® or its partner companies and is protected by copyright. Users of this information may download, print and copy the contents of the publication exclusively for their own purposes.

Our Recommendations

Our Memberships

Our Certification

Wojskowe Centrum Normalizacji Jakości I KodyfikacjiTÜV NORDTÜV RHEINLAND

Our Partnerships

Competencies