Business Review Poland – August 2026

August brought a dense run of regulatory and judicial developments touching almost every area of doing business in Poland, from company law and labour rules to VAT compliance and payroll administration. For companies relying on accounting and bookkeeping services in Poland, tax advisory or HR and payroll outsourcing, keeping pace with these changes is what separates smooth corporate compliance from costly correction. Below we set out what shifted over the month, and what it means in practice.

In this monthly business review, we present the most important developments from the past month that affect the conditions for doing business in Poland.

EU Inc. in Poland: what it means for foreign investors?

The European Commission presented its EU Inc. proposal on 18 March 2026 under procedure 2026/0074(COD), set out in draft Regulation COM(2026) 321, and it is worth understanding early even though nothing can be registered yet. EU Inc. is designed as an optional “28th regime” — a pan-European limited liability company that would sit alongside, rather than replace, familiar Polish vehicles such as the sp. z o.o. or the simple joint-stock company (PSA). Its headline features are attractive: fully online fast-track incorporation within 48 hours for no more than EUR 100, no minimum share capital (EUR 0 is permitted), a digital share register and standardised documents linked through the BRIS system. The Commission expects EU-wide administrative savings of EUR 328–440 million over ten years, assuming take-up by roughly 308,000 companies. Crucially, however, the form would harmonise only the corporate-law foundation — it would not create a single EU tax or labour regime, so a company registered in Poland would still face CIT, VAT, transfer-pricing and employment obligations under Polish law. The proposal foresees the Regulation applying only 12 months after it enters into force, and although institutions are aiming for political agreement by the end of 2026, there is still no binding launch date. In practice, this means investors should not defer entry into the Polish market on the strength of EU Inc.; the right structure will continue to turn on the target operating model, financing plans and local obligations rather than on registration speed alone.

Read the article for more details: EU Inc. in Poland – new EU company structure

Employment law update in Poland

Several parallel developments reshaped the labour landscape in a single month. On 30 July 2026, President Karol Nawrocki signed the Act of 19 June 2026 amending the Labour Code, which simplifies the statutory definition of workplace bullying (mobbing) and lifts the minimum compensation for it to no less than six times the statutory minimum wage; the Act enters into force three months after publication, leaving employers a finite window to update internal policies. On the same enforcement front, the CJEU ruled on 16 July 2026 in Joined Cases C-258/23, C-259/23 and C-260/23 that competition authorities may seize employees’ work emails without a prior court order, provided the action rests on clear legal grounds, stays proportionate and can be reviewed by a court afterwards — a line Polish businesses should watch as UOKiK and the courts test it in practice. Meanwhile, on 21 July 2026 the President referred the Act of 11 March 2026 amending the National Labour Inspectorate (PIP) Act to the Constitutional Tribunal, challenging both the PIP’s power to reclassify civil-law contracts as employment by administrative decision and the sharply increased fines; because this is an ex post review, the contested provisions remain fully binding until the Tribunal rules, which may take months or years. Finally, in Case C-110/24 (judgment of 9 October 2025) the CJEU confirmed that where staff are required to travel together in a company vehicle from a set location at set times, the whole journey in both directions counts as working time — though an ordinary commute to a fixed workplace, where the employee chooses how to travel, does not. In practice, this means HR and payroll teams should refresh anti-mobbing rules and compensation exposure now, reassess how travel time is recorded for field and mobile staff, and treat contract classification with particular care while the PIP rules stand.

Read the article for more details: Labour law in Poland: key employment updates for 2026

PPK Poland: employer obligations for Employee Capital Plans

Employee Capital Plans remain a permanent fixture of Polish payroll rather than a one-off project, and the numbers underline the scale: at the end of June 2026, PPK target-date funds held net assets of PLN 53.76 billion, with 4.4 million savers, 5.48 million active accounts and a 61.43% participation rate. Employers are generally obliged to establish and administer the scheme, financing a minimum contribution of 1.5% of remuneration and an optional further 2.5%, taking the maximum employer rate to 4%. Enrolment rules are exacting: individuals aged 18–54 are auto-enrolled unless they opt out, those aged 55–69 may join only on application, and no agreement can be concluded once a person turns 70. A participation agreement may be entered into no earlier than after 14 days of employment and no later than the 10th day of the month following completion of 90 days’ service, with any employment in the preceding 12 months with the same entity counting towards that period. Contributions must reach the financial institution by the 15th day of the following month — a payment deadline, not merely a filing one. The compliance stakes are real: encouraging staff to opt out or failing to sign a management agreement can trigger a fine of up to 1.5% of the prior year’s remuneration fund, while other breaches range from PLN 1,000 to PLN 1,000,000, and from 7 August 2026 PFR notices are served through the employer’s ZUS account. In practice, this means employers should begin preparing now for the 2027 automatic re-enrolment — informing previous opt-outs by the end of February, resuming contributions from 1 April unless a fresh opt-out is filed (effective no earlier than 1 March 2027), and stress-testing March payroll cut-offs before the next cycle.

Read the article for more details: PPK Poland (Employee Capital Plans): employer obligations

Employee commuting cost reimbursement in Poland: when does it create taxable income?

A ruling handed down by the Supreme Administrative Court (NSA) on 12 March 2026, ref. II FSK 775/23, has settled a question many employers get wrong: a cash allowance or reimbursement covering an ordinary home-to-work commute generally constitutes taxable employment income. The court grounded its reasoning in Article 12(1) of the Polish PIT Act, holding that reimbursing an expense the employee would otherwise bear leaves them financially better off — even where the workplace is poorly served by public transport, which may justify the spend commercially but does not create a tax exemption. Importantly, the judgment does not tax every form of staff transport: Article 21(1)(14a) of the PIT Act exempts transport organised by the employer using a bus, defined as a vehicle carrying more than nine people including the driver, so the vehicle’s legal classification is decisive. Where a smaller car or van is used, no automatic exemption applies, and the employer must assess voluntariness, genuine saving and whether the benefit’s value can be attributed to a specific person — an approach the KIS confirmed in its individual ruling of 12 January 2022, ref. 0113-KDIPT2-3.4011.877.2021.4.NM. The court also drew on the Constitutional Tribunal’s landmark decision of 8 July 2014, ref. K 7/13, on when free benefits become income. Where the benefit is taxable, the employer must add its value to employment income, calculate the PIT advance and report it correctly, including on the PIT-11, while the ZUS treatment requires a separate analysis. In practice, this means any company paying a commuting allowance — or about to launch a transport scheme — should review the arrangement before the next payroll run, confirm the vehicle type and settle the PIT and ZUS position in advance rather than after the fact.

Read the article for more details: Employee commuting cost reimbursement in Poland

Invoice mistakenly submitted to the National System of e-Invoices (KSeF) in Poland – must it be corrected to zero?

As businesses connect their ERP and accounting systems to KSeF, a recurring integration error has emerged: historical invoices already issued and delivered outside the system being re-submitted to KSeF, where they receive a KSeF number. Two divergent positions now shape the response. The Ministry of Finance, in a July 2026 response, indicated that a zero correction may be unnecessary where both documents can clearly be identified as the same invoice — judged against the issue date, the taxpayer’s invoice number, the date of supply, the line items and the total amount due. The Director of the National Revenue Information (KIS) took a firmer line in an individual ruling of 23 June 2026, ref. 0114-KDIP1-3.4012.298.2026.1.KP, treating the re-submitted invoice as reintroduced into legal circulation and requiring a zero correction, with reference to the risk under Article 108(1) of the Polish VAT Act. Neither position is universally binding — the Ministry response is not an official tax ruling, and the KIS ruling applies only to its specific facts — but the direction of travel matters where larger volumes, higher VAT amounts or material differences between documents are involved. It is also worth stressing that an invoice accepted by KSeF and assigned a number cannot simply be deleted or edited under the KSeF 2.0 Manual; any correction must go through a correcting invoice. In practice, this means a business that spots a duplicate should stop further automatic submissions, compare the documents line by line, assess the exposure under Article 108, and fix the underlying ERP or synchronisation cause before more historical files are pushed through.

Read the article for more details: Invoice mistakenly submitted to KSeF in Poland

August’s developments point to a familiar trend: the framework for doing business in Poland is tightening in detail rather than in headline rates, with courts, tax authorities and the legislature each sharpening how existing rules are applied — from EU-level company-law reform and evolving labour standards to the practical mechanics of KSeF, payroll and PIT. For companies operating here, the common thread is that operational decisions increasingly carry tax, payroll and compliance consequences that are best addressed before, not after, they reach the accounts.

At getsix®, we support businesses by providing a full range of services in accounting, tax, HR and payroll, as well as company registration, administrative support, reporting, and international advisory both in Poland and abroad.

This article was written by the getsix® Editorial Team
getsix® provides accounting, tax advisory, HR and payroll, and business consulting services, supporting companies operating in Poland. The getsix® Editorial Team prepares practical information that makes Polish accounting, tax, and HR and payroll matters easier to understand.

If you have any questions regarding this topic or if you are in need for any additional information – please do not hesitate to contact us:

Ask a question »

CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS DEPARTMENT

ELŻBIETA
NARON-GROCHALSKA
Head of Customer Relationships
Department / Senior Manager
getsix® Group

***